http://www.iwaponline.com/jwh/005/jwh0050267.htm
Journal of Water and Health Vol 5 No 2 pp 267–282 © IWA Publishing 2007 doi:10.2166/wh.2007.008
A comparison of ten USEPA approved total coliform/E. coli tests
Jeremy Olstadt, James Jay Schauer, Jon Standridge and Sharon Kluender
Water Bacteriology Department, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, 2601 Agriculture Dr., P.O. Box 7996, Madison,
WI 53707-7996, USA Tel.: 608-224-6262Fax: 608-224-6267olstadjm@mail.slh.wisc.edu
Environmental Chemistry and Technology Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 600 N. Park Street, Madison, WI
USA
Environmental Health, Department – Water Bacteriology, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, University of
Wisconsin-Madison, 2601 Agriculture Drive, Madison, WI 53718, USA
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ABSTRACT
Since 2002, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has approved ten enzyme-based total
coliform and E. coli detection tests for examination of drinking water. These tests include: Colilert®, Colilert-18®,
Colisure®, m-Coli Blue 24®, Readycult® Coliforms 100, Chromocult®, Coliscan®, E*Colite®, Colitag™ and MI Agar. The
utility of the enzyme based test systems is based on both the ability of the test to detect the target organisms at low
levels and the ability of the test system to suppress the growth of non-target organisms that might result in false positive
results. Differences in the ability of some of these methods to detect total coliform and E. coli, as well as suppress
Aeromonas spp., a common cause of “false positive” results, have been observed. As a result, this study was
undertaken to elucidate the strengths and weaknesses of each method. Water samples were collected from three
geographically and chemically diverse groundwaters in Wisconsin. One-hundred milliliter aliquots were individually
spiked with both low concentrations (one to ten organisms) and high concentrations (fifty to one-hundred) of each of
five different total coliform organisms (Serratia, Citrobacter, Enterobacter, E. coli, & Klebsiella). These spiked
samples were used to test the capability of ten enzyme-based test systems to both detect and enumerate the spiked
organisms. In addition, 100 ml samples were independently spiked with two different strains of Aeromonas
spp. at six different levels, to assess the ability of each enzyme-based test to suppress Aeromonas spp.
Analysis of the data indicated that wide variability exists among USEPA approved tests to detect and quantify total
coliforms, as well as suppress Aeromonas spp.
Keywords: Aeromonas spp.; enzyme-based test; E. coli; groundwater; total coliform